I recall the passage being about a man who had his head gorily crushed by a monster--literary violence is only really sort of my cup of tea, given my affinity for dark fantasy--surrounded by some very beautiful prose. The prose was effused with the reactions of the characters, namely disgust and revulsion, but with a strange humor peeping through. I can't remember where the passage was exactly (it's a whopping 650 pages, but if you find it, let me know). What was immediately evident was that this story was in the hands of a literary master, somebody who loved language and whose skill reminded me of Angela Carter. I bought it and unfortunately, had to shelve it until I finished reading a few "practical" books.
When I did get around to starting it, I realized I was in for a mighty ride. From Cameron's familiarity with medieval culture and armory, I knew I was in good company. This is a man who rivals every medieval scholar out there in terms of love of topic and an excellent working knowledge (I would say expertise, but medievalists specialize too much for that). There's nothing boring or slow about the intense layering of details, and I loved the feeling that as the reader, I too was being marched around the battlefield.
Then, la! Characterization is definitely Cameron's other strong point. On an individual level, his characters grapple with personal problems and each other. Most of the characters are as flawed as any grimdark protagonist, yet there are two important differences. One, each character is relatively likable. They may not have the best personalities, but they have realistic motivations and emotions, which is the inherent appeal of flawed heroes. Two, as Jeff Gerke highlighted in The First 50 Pages, every character has some speck of goodness in them, even if it's buried deep. The goodness in them is a redeeming factor, but doesn't compromise the distinct tone of moral ambiguity.
The goodness is also a significant way to distinguish The Red Knight from the very bastion of dark fantasy (grimdark? I'm not sure it qualifies), George R. R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire. I love Martin, but I don't like feeling the hatred Arya feels towards the Lannisters (and many more), or the contempt Stannis carries around like a banner. I'm only halfway through A Storm of Swords but there are only a handful of characters I genuinely sympathize with, and they're all fighting each other. And on top of that, none of the characters seem to have any true moral values, like empathy or a sense of justice. Maybe Martin is too subtle for me. The important part about this is that Miles Cameron's characters usually do stand for some sort of goodness, even if they don't want to.
We initially meet the protagonist because the company of mercs he leads been hired to protect an abbey. It seems simple enough (this is a very pared down version). Initially, he's getting paid to do the "right" thing, but in the end, the payment becomes almost irrelevant. Protecting the abbey becomes about self validation, guarding his fellow man, and besting a cruel and manipulative enemy. Those are all causes that as the reader, I can get behind. It was a relief to have a cause that I know is right, because for me, in real life righteousness comes down to a matter of choices, not personal glory. Not the chain reaction you see in ASoIaF. Don't get me wrong--I love Martin, and his stories have a place. Give me characters like the ones Cameron created, however, and I feel like I know them.
To explore this point a little further, I'll give why caring for the characters and their choice to do right (or what for them is right) is so important: the injuries and deaths in the story actually matter. In Martin's stories, people are maimed or die left and right, with no consequence. In The Red Knight, each injury is described in detail, and you can feel the characters bleed. When one of the more important NPCs dies, I felt a very real sadness for them. Cameron wroughts this effect with subtlety, using the characters' goodness, and as a reader and someone who appreciates literature, I am so grateful to him for that.
The story itself reminded me of LotR from Cameron's love of his characters, and his portrayals of epic battles. That comparison still breaks down a little down characterization lines, funnily enough. I realized last night that another reason how The Red Knight succeeds is that for the most part, the characters are very ordinary. Royalty and aristocracy is mentioned, and it comes and goes for the protagonist. The aristocracy is often portrayed in a comic light, which is a delight to read after we get such a solemn treatment of it in other works. By and large, the characters in The Red Knight are ordinary folk, and they are all too aware of that. It makes them homey, gives them warts, but they are beautiful in their imperfection. I loved that aspect of the story, because they are endearing and yet they act naturally.
The spine on my copy of the book reads "1", so I'm guessing a trilogy is to be born out of this. I will be seeking out more of Miles Cameron's work, if only because as with the same fever I got with Harry Potter, I have to know more! The story left off with a "wheels within wheels" ending, and I want to see the trap unfold. Particularly because the protagonist knows there's a trap, and is choosing to march on in anyways, whistling a tune.
Here's a link to Cameron's website below. If you have any questions or want to leave any feedback, comment away!
http://www.traitorson.com/
Here's a link to Cameron's website below. If you have any questions or want to leave any feedback, comment away!
http://www.traitorson.com/